🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.