🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president wooed voters with promises to reduce prices starting on day one. However, once his inauguration, there was precious little attention to the cost of living. All that changed following inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to address living costs. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days post-election, the president began his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—often mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. Essentially, he dismissed their concerns as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. How could every price be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and coffee prices jumped by nearly 19%—in part because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Economic Statements

Despite these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks ignore the reality that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he claimed that fuel costs had fallen to around two dollars, even though government figures show they average over three dollars.

Faced with reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “prices are down” message made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb following promises of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Possible Impact

As certain taxes reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. In another instance, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he stated that “this is the golden age of America” and told listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Truth and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, recently contradicted assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, certain sectors of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary urged the central bank to cut interest rates—a move that could ease financial pressure.

In response to widespread concern about affordability, Trump suggested a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea could increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and potentially drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for affordability involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that they could lower housing costs. But, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—often reducing them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials stated they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and untruthful allegations. Actually, Biden handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. But, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if large states such as major economies tumble into recession, the nation could face a broad economic slump. During recessions, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and price increases usually declines. Sadly, with the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.